111

Monday, 27 April 2020

Have Liberals traded freedom for security?

Season Confalone: I agree. But he doubled down on Bush's bet.

Azalee Ahrendes:

Faviola Dewire: Show me a conservative that thinks the Pastor should be burning books. Even Palin and Beck condemned it. Show me a liberal who wants the Government to stop it.

Marti Declue: Some, yes

Rosalyn Olivera: It was the Republicans who were in power when we surrendered our rights against government eavesdropping, unreasonable search and seizure, and even habeus corpus itself. These are the bases of our freedom, surrendered for security and not yet recovered.

Jonie Lauria: He goes the way the ratings go, dot. That is Sean.

Tomi Vauters: Did you know that Liberal is derived from and based around Liberty?Did you know that democrat and liberal are entirely different groups?Did you know that the republicans created the patriot act and that the democrats continued it?What does that tell you about who it is that's trading freedom for security?...Show more!

Sharie Sommerville: If Trump and Hannity don't pay Michael Cohen then how does he earn money? I'm not Russian to conclusions, I'm just Putin it out there.

Johnny Sirko: Considering Bush increased the size of gov by 40 % while in office see office of homeland security. I would say republicans have done so. Ben franklin also begged the french to help us win the revolution so is a socalist liberal too ?

Autumn Vacio: Maybe Cohen doesn’t have a law degree.

Frances Macky: The Socialists in Democratic Party clothing have sold ALL their ethics cheaply for a Socialist agenda.That or they spend their time as apologists for those that are Socialists.President Obama was a former member of The New Party in Illinois, a party that pushed the agenda of the Democratic Socialists of America.http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_and_the_...http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/302031/obam...70+ Democratic Congressmen are also members of the Socialist Party (Pu! blic Record)http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2010/08/american-s! ...Another set of the Congress members in the Democratic Party are also members of the Democratic Socialists of America.http://sovereignty.net/center/socialists.htmToo late.I have nothing but contempt for them and their apologists.I am a JFK Democrat.He was killed by a Socialist.I will NEVER be a Socialist....Show more

Davina Shindler: No unless you are giving them credit for the Patriot Act.

Alexis Reyer: They've sold out the finances of future generations in order to fund the current welfare state.

Scot Rotruck: Is this a joke? I could have sworn it was the Republican President with the Republican controlled Congress that passed domestic spying laws and the stripping of all Constitutional rights of any citizen declared a "terrorist".Not to mention the recent NDAA act that denies a trial and due process to any citizen declared a terrorist had almost 50-50 bipartisan support.http://www.dailypaul.com/198522/senators-who-voted......Show more

Adam Moma! ya: Bush started the PATRIOT act

Andrew Sinatra: It's like Trump telling reporters on Air Force One that he didn't know about the non-disclosure agreement with Stormy Daniels or the $130,000 payment to her while at the same time seeking an injunction in court to enforce said non-disclosure agreement with a gag order. So which is it? Because you can't truthfully claim you had an agreement and at the same time truthfully claim you did not know about that agreement. Agreement requires that that the parties agree. That's why they call it an "agreement." And the act of agreeing means you at least know about the agreement. Some are suggesting that Cohen acted unilaterally, but a lawyer can't agree on behalf of their client. To be legally binding, both Daniels and Trump had to themselves agree to terms, so we know Trump was lying on Air Force One because there's no way that Cohen handed Daniels $130,000 for what any first year law student would know would be non-bindi! ng without both parties expressly agreeing....Show more

Herma Ell! ebrecht: Why does it have to be one or the other?

Kiersten Clayburn: He wants to have it both ways because at any moment in time it might be better to have it one way or the other. He’s scared. It pretty much shows that he’s lying through his teeth, not simply mistaken, when it comes to accusing the feds of bad faith. Very likely he didn’t do anything illegal, but when under scrutiny, people imagine all kinds of things. Half the time you don’t know whether you’ve broken any laws or not, when you’re dealing with big bucks.

Cletus Crotts: Trust me. Old Ben would love Social Security and Medicare.

Rodrigo Pezley:

Tamatha Neubaum: What freedom are they jeapordizing they're giving free health care away for people who can't afford it. You can still own your guns, drink as much as you want, and believe in any religon.

Debora Soliani: It is whatever argument that happens to work in his favor.

Anton Waln: who cares

Olen Penhall! urick: No, but Republicans have. Though that "security" is the total opposite.

Sol Allphin: Winston Churchill

Buster Buchko: Why do you like watching Sean Hannity? Is he your man crush?

Ulrike Hert: Those are 2 separate things. No need to choose one or the other.

Talisha Digrande: Security is what the second amendment is for and liberals are fighting to do away with it.

Shon Almquist: Ive never heard anybody call him that.

Willa Holte:

Esteban Faggett: Cohen is not is attorney. Sean Hannity, like everyone else in the country, believes in attorney-client privilege. Not just for himself; but for everybody.

No comments:

Post a Comment